NIHAL CHAND(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/17487/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010685642025
Filing Number
CWP/57988/2025
Filing Date
10-Nov-2025
Registration No
CWP/17487/2025
Registration Date
10-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NIHAL CHAND(Not Applicable)
Adv. Mohamed Ahamed Safee,Sameer Miyan,Sameer Miyan, ,Pranav Kumar Kaushal,Sameer Miyan
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Tara Chand Chauhan,AG,Komal Chaudhary 1123
-
2.Director of Elementary Education(Not Applicable)
-
3.Deputy Director of Elementary Education(Not Applicable)
-
4.Accountant General(Not Applicable)
Adv. Tara Chand Chauhan
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
Case Summary: CWP No. 17487/2025 In this civil writ petition by Nihal Chand against the State of HP, the court ordered the respondents to immediately release the pending balance of gratuity amount to the petitioner (total gratuity minus already deducted amounts), provided there is no legal impediment. The respondents were granted four weeks to file their reply, with interim relief continuing until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
26-Dec-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
-
11-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/17487/2025
Case Summary: CWP No. 17487/2025 In this civil writ petition by Nihal Chand against the State of HP, the court ordered the respondents to immediately release the pending balance of gratuity amount to the petitioner (total gratuity minus already deducted amounts), provided there is no legal impediment. The respondents were granted four weeks to file their reply, with interim relief continuing until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts