JASWANT SINGH(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/18847/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.
CNR: HPHC010676302025
Filing Number
CWP/57190/2025
Filing Date
04-Nov-2025
Registration No
CWP/18847/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 15-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JASWANT SINGH(Not Applicable)
Adv. Aman Parth Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed both writ petitions and set aside the Divisional Commissioner's order dated 22.08.2025, finding that the Commissioner improperly granted interim relief by staying prior orders without first deciding the condonation of delay applications filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court directed the Divisional Commissioner to consider and decide the delay condonation applications before proceeding with any interim relief in the underlying revenue revision petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
02-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/18847/2025
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed both writ petitions and set aside the Divisional Commissioner's order dated 22.08.2025, finding that the Commissioner improperly granted interim relief by staying prior orders without first deciding the condonation of delay applications filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court directed the Divisional Commissioner to consider and decide the delay condonation applications before proceeding with any interim relief in the underlying revenue revision petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts