COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) AG vs Santu(Not Applicable) — CMP.M/498/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O22 R4. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010674872024

Filing Number

CMP.M/55693/2024

Filing Date

18-Dec-2024

Registration No

CMP.M/498/2025

Registration Date

08-Apr-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O22 R4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) AG

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Santu(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    In CMP(M) No.498 of 2025, the court allowed the Collector of Land Acquisition's application to bring the legal heirs of deceased respondent Santu (who died on 10.12.2007) on record, after setting aside the abatement of the case. The application was supported by death certificates and a Legal Heirs Certificate. The court also deleted one respondent's name and condoned a 203-day delay in filing the appeal, finding sufficient explanation for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 25-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  6. 10-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  7. 18-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP.M/498/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In CMP(M) No.498 of 2025, the court allowed the Collector of Land Acquisition's application to bring the legal heirs of deceased respondent Santu (who died on 10.12.2007) on record, after setting aside the abatement of the case. The application was supported by death certificates and a Legal Heirs Certificate. The court also deleted one respondent's name and condoned a 203-day delay in filing the appeal, finding sufficient explanation for the delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case