NISHMA KUMARI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — EX.P./2451/2025

Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16. Disposed: Uncontested--Disposed Off on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010662372025

Filing Number

EX.P./56053/2025

Filing Date

29-Oct-2025

Registration No

EX.P./2451/2025

Registration Date

06-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section R16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NISHMA KUMARI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Virbahadur Verma,Mukul Sharma,Mukul Sharma, ,Anu Minhas,Mukul Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director of Health Service, Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the execution petition after the respondents filed a compliance affidavit with a consideration order dated 25.11.2025. However, the petitioner retained the right to pursue appropriate legal remedies to address her remaining grievances, including challenging the consideration order itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  4. 10-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  5. 29-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EX.P./2451/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the execution petition after the respondents filed a compliance affidavit with a consideration order dated 25.11.2025. However, the petitioner retained the right to pursue appropriate legal remedies to address her remaining grievances, including challenging the consideration order itself. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case