NITISH SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs TORUL S. RAVEESH(Not Applicable) — COPC/1230/2025

Case under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 10/12. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010660942025

Filing Number

COPC/55923/2025

Filing Date

29-Oct-2025

Registration No

COPC/1230/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 10/12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITISH SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashwani Gupta,Abhendra Gupta,Abhendra Gupta, ,Abhendra Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TORUL S. RAVEESH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary: COPC No. 1230/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed contempt proceedings against respondent Torul S. Raveesh after he filed a compliance affidavit with an office order dated 19.12.2025. The petitioner's counsel confirmed that the compliance documents adequately redressed the petitioner's grievance. The court discharged the notice to the respondent and disposed of all pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  4. 26-Nov-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  5. 29-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/1230/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COPC No. 1230/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed contempt proceedings against respondent Torul S. Raveesh after he filed a compliance affidavit with an office order dated 19.12.2025. The petitioner's counsel confirmed that the compliance documents adequately redressed the petitioner's grievance. The court discharged the notice to the respondent and disposed of all pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case