Vikram Singh(Not Applicable) vs Anil Sharma(Not Applicable) — CR.R/626/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438&442. Disposed: Contested--Compromised. on 09th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010658222025
Filing Number
CR.R/10100/2025
Filing Date
28-Oct-2025
Registration No
CR.R/626/2025
Registration Date
01-Nov-2025
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Compromised.
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vikram Singh(Not Applicable)
Adv. Heena Chauhan,Kiran Dhiman,Kiran Dhiman, ,Kiran Dhiman
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anil Sharma(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Kunal Thakur 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Lok Adalat Bench-1,Lok Adalat Bench 2View PDF
Case Summary: CR.R/626/2025 — Vikram Singh v. Anil Sharma The National Lok Adalat settled the criminal revision matter between petitioner Vikram Singh and respondent Anil Sharma through a compromise deed signed by both parties with their free consent. The court found the settlement valid and ordered that the compounding of the offence shall effect an acquittal, resulting in Vikram Singh's acquittal. No compounding fee was imposed given the parties' cost-effective and speedy resolution before the Lok Adalat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
02-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
-
03-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CR.R/626/2025
Case Summary: CR.R/626/2025 — Vikram Singh v. Anil Sharma The National Lok Adalat settled the criminal revision matter between petitioner Vikram Singh and respondent Anil Sharma through a compromise deed signed by both parties with their free consent. The court found the settlement valid and ordered that the compounding of the offence shall effect an acquittal, resulting in Vikram Singh's acquittal. No compounding fee was imposed given the parties' cost-effective and speedy resolution before the Lok Adalat. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts