Jeet Ram(Not Applicable) vs Surender Kumar and another(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sangram Singh Chandel, ,Prikshit Rathour — CR.R/813/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 442. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010647942024

Filing Number

CR.R/12919/2024

Filing Date

07-Dec-2024

Registration No

CR.R/813/2024

Registration Date

13-Dec-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438, 442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jeet Ram(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sanjay Bhardwaj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Surender Kumar and another(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sangram Singh Chandel, ,Prikshit Rathour

  2. 2.State of HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    Case: CR.R/813/2024 - Jeet Ram vs. Surender Kumar and anr. In this criminal revision petition heard on 23.03.2026, the court adjourned the matter for three weeks at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on the merits was passed; the case is listed for further hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  4. 15-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  5. 06-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  6. 10-Mar-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  7. 28-Feb-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  8. 16-Dec-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  9. 16-Dec-2024

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  10. 07-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.R/813/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case: CR.R/813/2024 - Jeet Ram vs. Surender Kumar and anr. In this criminal revision petition heard on 23.03.2026, the court adjourned the matter for three weeks at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on the merits was passed; the case is listed for further hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case