RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs HPSEBL AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/17945/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010646962025
Filing Number
CWP/54723/2025
Filing Date
16-Oct-2025
Registration No
CWP/17945/2025
Registration Date
18-Nov-2025
Judge
Additional Registrar(j)
Coram
Additional Registrar(j)
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 13-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJESH KUMAR AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Onkar Jairath,Anshul Jairath,Anshul Jairath, ,Anil Kumar Manget,Anshul Jairath
-
2.Sukha Devi(Not Applicable)
-
3.Ravinder Singh(Not Applicable)
-
4.Pooja(Not Applicable)
-
5.Vinod Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
6.Sulkshana(Not Applicable)
-
7.Rohini Kanwar(Not Applicable)
-
8.Anand Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
9.Suresh Sharma(Not Applicable)
-
10.Sanam(Not Applicable)
-
11.Sanju Kumari(Not Applicable)
-
12.Kamlesh(Not Applicable)
-
13.Ranjna Sharma(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.HPSEBL AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Virender Singh Kanwar 1123
-
2.M/s Jagmohan Singh Service Provider(Not Applicable)
-
3.M/s Saraswati Dotcom Private Limited Shimla(Not Applicable)
-
4.M/s Him Productive of Education Shimla(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
Summary: In CWP No. 17945 of 2025, the court adjourned the case for four weeks to await reply from respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 3 appeared through its HR Manager, while respondent No. 2 failed to appear despite valid service. The Registry was directed to clarify which respondent is represented by advocate Virender Kanwar. The case is listed for further hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Dec-2025
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
19-Nov-2025
Office Objection
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
-
16-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/17945/2025
Summary: In CWP No. 17945 of 2025, the court adjourned the case for four weeks to await reply from respondent No. 1. Respondent No. 3 appeared through its HR Manager, while respondent No. 2 failed to appear despite valid service. The Registry was directed to clarify which respondent is represented by advocate Virender Kanwar. The case is listed for further hearing after four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts