SATYENDER SINGH GANDHI(Not Applicable) vs M/S M.V. WINE through its proprietor AND ORS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Vijay Kumar, NEMO — ARB.C/358/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6). Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HPHC010640272025

Filing Number

ARB.C/54164/2025

Filing Date

15-Oct-2025

Registration No

ARB.C/358/2025

Registration Date

04-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATYENDER SINGH GANDHI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ganesh Barowalia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S M.V. WINE through its proprietor AND ORS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Vijay Kumar, NEMO

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh SandhawaliaView PDF

    Case Summary: In Arbitration Case No. 358/2025, the court noted that respondents No. 1-7 failed to file their reply and Power of Attorney as required. The court directed the respondents to complete the necessary filing by the next date and adjourned the proceedings to 19.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh SandhawaliaView PDF

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia

  7. 12-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh SandhawaliaView PDF

  8. 12-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 15-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARB.C/358/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Arbitration Case No. 358/2025, the court noted that respondents No. 1-7 failed to file their reply and Power of Attorney as required. The court directed the respondents to complete the necessary filing by the next date and adjourned the proceedings to 19.06.2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case