RANVIJAY SINGH(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/16387/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010636012025

Filing Number

CWP/53843/2025

Filing Date

14-Oct-2025

Registration No

CWP/16387/2025

Registration Date

15-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANVIJAY SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Anil Kumar Jaswal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Director of School Education,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP 16387/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed Ranvijay Singh's petition seeking arrears of pay, allowances, and consequential benefits for his position as Principal (School Cadre) Class-1 (Gazetted). The court found the petitioner's case was similarly situated to an earlier judgment in CWP 9321/2025 (Vijay Parmar case) and disposed of the petition by applying the same directions from that precedent judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  4. 28-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  5. 28-Oct-2025

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  6. 14-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/16387/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP 16387/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh allowed Ranvijay Singh's petition seeking arrears of pay, allowances, and consequential benefits for his position as Principal (School Cadre) Class-1 (Gazetted). The court found the petitioner's case was similarly situated to an earlier judgment in CWP 9321/2025 (Vijay Parmar case) and disposed of the petition by applying the same directions from that precedent judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case