KHUSHI RAM(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CMP/26181/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 151. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010629422025

Filing Number

CMP/53284/2025

Filing Date

10-Oct-2025

Registration No

CMP/26181/2025

Registration Date

31-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHUSHI RAM(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vijay Bir Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: Khushi Ram vs. State of H.P. (CMP 26181/2025) The court dismissed the execution petition after finding that Khushi Ram's claim had been rejected by the H.P. PWD authorities through orders dated 11.11.2025 and 20.03.2026. Since the court's earlier directions were only to decide the petitioner's representation in light of a prior judgment (CWPOA No.6468 of 2020), no further adjudication remained. The petitioner was left at liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Dec-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 06-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  5. 06-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma

  6. 10-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP/26181/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Khushi Ram vs. State of H.P. (CMP 26181/2025) The court dismissed the execution petition after finding that Khushi Ram's claim had been rejected by the H.P. PWD authorities through orders dated 11.11.2025 and 20.03.2026. Since the court's earlier directions were only to decide the petitioner's representation in light of a prior judgment (CWPOA No.6468 of 2020), no further adjudication remained. The petitioner was left at liberty to pursue appropriate legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case