ASHISH SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ANR(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/1017/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010622952025
Filing Number
CRMMO/9536/2025
Filing Date
08-Oct-2025
Registration No
CRMMO/1017/2025
Registration Date
17-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHISH SHARMA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Advocate- ,Karan Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND ANR(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.Madhu Bahl(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
In Cr. MMO No. 1017 of 2025, the court discharged the appointed Legal Aid Counsel after petitioner Ashish Sharma declined legal aid services and chose to represent himself. The case was adjourned with directions to call for records for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
02-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
19-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
19-Dec-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
04-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
06-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
30-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
30-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRMMO/1017/2025
In Cr. MMO No. 1017 of 2025, the court discharged the appointed Legal Aid Counsel after petitioner Ashish Sharma declined legal aid services and chose to represent himself. The case was adjourned with directions to call for records for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts