ASHA DEVI(Not Applicable) vs Assistant Development Officer(Not Applicable) Advocate - Abhishek Nagta, ,Mohit Jaitak,Abhishek Nagta,Abhishek Nagta — RSA/236/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010597462025

Filing Number

RSA/50597/2025

Filing Date

22-Sep-2025

Registration No

RSA/236/2025

Registration Date

28-Oct-2025

Judge

Additional Registrar(j)

Coram

Additional Registrar(j)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHA DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Surinder Kumar Saklani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Assistant Development Officer(Not Applicable) Advocate - Abhishek Nagta, ,Mohit Jaitak,Abhishek Nagta,Abhishek Nagta

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

    Case Summary - RSA No. 236 of 2025 The appeal filed by Asha Devi against the Assistant Development Officer was admitted on 30.03.2026. At the hearing on 25.05.2026, both parties were duly represented. The court ordered the registry to append a completion certificate after rechecking records and service, with the case listed for hearing in due course. No interim applications were pending for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

  5. 24-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  6. 03-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF

  7. 03-Nov-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi

  8. 22-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/236/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - RSA No. 236 of 2025 The appeal filed by Asha Devi against the Assistant Development Officer was admitted on 30.03.2026. At the hearing on 25.05.2026, both parties were duly represented. The court ordered the registry to append a completion certificate after rechecking records and service, with the case listed for hearing in due course. No interim applications were pending for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case