MANOJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/16546/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010587642025

Filing Number

CWP/49752/2025

Filing Date

18-Sep-2025

Registration No

CWP/16546/2025

Registration Date

17-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Virender Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Shreya Chauhan,AG 1123

  2. 2.Engineer In-Chief, HPPWD(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.National Highway Authority of India (NHAI)(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Superintendent Engineer, HPPWD(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    In CWP No.16546/2025, the petition by Manoj Kumar and another against the State of HP and others was heard on 06.05.2026. The court directed respondents to file their reply within three weeks and listed the case for further hearing thereafter. Additionally, the petitioners were directed to file English translations of the annexures within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  7. 13-Nov-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  8. 18-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/16546/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In CWP No.16546/2025, the petition by Manoj Kumar and another against the State of HP and others was heard on 06.05.2026. The court directed respondents to file their reply within three weeks and listed the case for further hearing thereafter. Additionally, the petitioners were directed to file English translations of the annexures within three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case