DHRUV DOGRA(Not Applicable) vs BHARTI BHARDWAJ(Not Applicable) Advocate - Nidhi Singh, ,Nidhi Singh,NEMO — FAO(FC)/92/2025
Case under Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 19(1). Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HPHC010585882025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
FAO(FC)/49589/2025
Filing Date
17-09-2025
Registration No
FAO(FC)/92/2025
Registration Date
29-11-2025
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DHRUV DOGRA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Naveen Kumar Bhardwaj
Respondent(s)
BHARTI BHARDWAJ(Not Applicable) Advocate - Nidhi Singh, ,Nidhi Singh,NEMO
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK SINGH THAKUR , HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN SHARMA
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
ORDERS
ORDERS
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-03-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 16-06-2026 | ORDERS |
| 25-05-2026 | ORDERS |
| 04-05-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 05-03-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
Orders
Case Summary: FAO(FC) /92/2025 Dhruv Dogra appealed against interim maintenance awarded by the Trial Court under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. On 25.05.2026, the respondent raised a maintainability objection to the appeal. The court adjourned the main appeal for consideration on 16.06.2026 to allow the appellant time to respond. Additionally, the court ordered the registry to release the deposited amount to the respondent via bank transfer, with remaining replies due within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: FAO(FC) /92/2025 Dhruv Dogra appealed against interim maintenance awarded by the Trial Court under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. On 25.05.2026, the respondent raised a maintainability objection to the appeal. The court adjourned the main appeal for consideration on 16.06.2026 to allow the appellant time to respond. Additionally, the court ordered the registry to release the deposited amount to the respondent via bank transfer, with remaining replies due within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts