DIVISIONLA MANAGER HPSFDC LIMITED(Not Applicable) vs BABU RAM CHANDEL(Not Applicable) — ARB.C/364/2025
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010574542025
Filing Number
ARB.C/48611/2025
Filing Date
15-Sep-2025
Registration No
ARB.C/364/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DIVISIONLA MANAGER HPSFDC LIMITED(Not Applicable)
Adv. Kiran Dhiman
Respondent(s)
-
1.BABU RAM CHANDEL(Not Applicable)
Adv. NEMO 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh SandhawaliaView PDF
Case Summary: ARB.C/364/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the arbitration appeal filed by Divisional Manager HPSFDC Limited against Babu Ram as withdrawn. The court found that no notice had been issued to commence arbitral proceedings or raise a specific demand, rendering the appeal premature. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the court afresh once a fresh cause of action arises. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh SandhawaliaView PDF
-
02-Jan-2026
Orders
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh Sandhawalia
-
21-Nov-2025
Hon'ble The Chief Justice Gurmeet Singh SandhawaliaView PDF
-
21-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. ARB.C/364/2025
Case Summary: ARB.C/364/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the arbitration appeal filed by Divisional Manager HPSFDC Limited against Babu Ram as withdrawn. The court found that no notice had been issued to commence arbitral proceedings or raise a specific demand, rendering the appeal premature. The petitioner was granted liberty to approach the court afresh once a fresh cause of action arises. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts