STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) AG vs Savitri Devi(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, ,GEORGE — LPA/834/2025

Case under Delhi High Court Act, 1966 Section C10. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010569502025

e-Filing Number

02-09-2025

Filing Number

LPA/48197/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

LPA/834/2025

Registration Date

05-Dec-2025

Judge

Additional Registrar(j)

Coram

Additional Registrar(j)

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Delhi High Court Act, 1966 Section C10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) AG

  2. 2.Engineer in Chief HPPWD Nigam Vihar Shimla 2(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Seema Sharma

  3. 3.Chief Engineer MZ HPPWD Mandi District Mandi HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Seema Sharma

  4. 4.Executive Engineer HPPWD B and R Division Sarkaghat District Mandi HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Seema Sharma

  5. 5.Assistant Engineer HPPWD B and R Sub Division Bhaderwar Tehsil Sarkaghat District Mandi HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Seema Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Savitri Devi(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, ,GEORGE

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

    Case Summary: LPA-834/2025 The case was heard on 06.05.2026 with the State of HP represented by Deputy AG and respondent Savitri Devi represented by counsel. Notice to the respondent was validly served. The court granted three weeks' time to the respondent's counsel to file a Petition on Affidavit (POA), and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Orders

    Additional Registrar(j)

  4. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. LPA/834/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LPA-834/2025 The case was heard on 06.05.2026 with the State of HP represented by Deputy AG and respondent Savitri Devi represented by counsel. Notice to the respondent was validly served. The court granted three weeks' time to the respondent's counsel to file a Petition on Affidavit (POA), and the case was adjourned accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case