NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD(Not Applicable) vs SUMAN(Not Applicable) Advocate - Parul, ,Jagat Pal,NEMO — FAO/288/2025
Case under Employees Compensation Act Section 30. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010559842025
Filing Number
FAO/47400/2025
Filing Date
08-Sep-2025
Registration No
FAO/288/2025
Registration Date
01-Nov-2025
Judge
Additional Registrar(j)
Coram
Additional Registrar(j)
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ishan Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUMAN(Not Applicable) Advocate - Parul, ,Jagat Pal,NEMO
-
2.Manoj Khurana S/o Sh. Naresh Kumar(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
27-May-2026
Additional Registrar(j)View PDF
Summary: In FAO No. 288/2025 (National Insurance Company Ltd v. Suman and others), the court issued notice to respondent No. 2 for 28.05.2026. When the respondent refused to accept service, the process server affixed notice on his house, which was deemed valid service. The court directed that the respondent be proceeded against ex-parte and ordered the matter to be processed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
04-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
02-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
30-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
30-Dec-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
08-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
06-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/288/2025
Summary: In FAO No. 288/2025 (National Insurance Company Ltd v. Suman and others), the court issued notice to respondent No. 2 for 28.05.2026. When the respondent refused to accept service, the process server affixed notice on his house, which was deemed valid service. The court directed that the respondent be proceeded against ex-parte and ordered the matter to be processed further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts