SHANTA KANWAR(Not Applicable) vs KARAN DIWAN(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, ,Aruna Chauhan,Narender Chauhan,NEMO — CR.R/620/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438&442. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010551702025

Filing Number

CR.R/8437/2025

Filing Date

04-Sep-2025

Registration No

CR.R/620/2025

Registration Date

30-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438&442

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHANTA KANWAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Surinder Singh Chauhan,Virender Singh Rathore,Virender Singh Rathore, ,Rohit Shayam,Virender Singh Rathore

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KARAN DIWAN(Not Applicable) Advocate - NEMO, ,Aruna Chauhan,Narender Chauhan,NEMO

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

    Case CR.R/620/2025 Summary: The court found that petitioner Shanta Kanwar deposited only 20% of the ordered compensation amount instead of 25%, and directed that necessary consequences will follow for non-compliance. The Trial Court record was received, but the Appellate Court record remains pending. The Registry was directed to issue an urgent reminder to the Appellate Court to furnish the record, with the matter to be relisted thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  4. 09-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  5. 18-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  6. 31-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF

  7. 31-Oct-2025

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kainthla

  8. 04-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CR.R/620/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case CR.R/620/2025 Summary: The court found that petitioner Shanta Kanwar deposited only 20% of the ordered compensation amount instead of 25%, and directed that necessary consequences will follow for non-compliance. The Trial Court record was received, but the Appellate Court record remains pending. The Registry was directed to issue an urgent reminder to the Appellate Court to furnish the record, with the matter to be relisted thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case