HEM RAJ SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CR.R/711/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 27th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010547742025
Filing Number
CR.R/8369/2025
Filing Date
03-Sep-2025
Registration No
CR.R/711/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
27-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEM RAJ SHARMA(Not Applicable)
Adv. Roop Lal Chaudhary,H.R.Sidhu,H.R.Sidhu, ,H.R.Sidhu
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: CR.R/711/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed the trial court's vehicle confiscation order, finding procedural violations under the NDPS Act. The lower court had ordered confiscation of petitioner Hem Raj Sharma's Alto car (used by his driver in drug trafficking) without providing prior notice to the vehicle owner or hearing him on the confiscation issue, despite Section 63(2) of the NDPS Act mandating such notice. Since Sharma testified as a prosecution witness that his driver misused the vehicle without his knowledge, the court held confiscation improper absent evidence of his connivance or knowledge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
24-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
24-Dec-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
18-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CR.R/711/2025
Case Summary: CR.R/711/2025 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh quashed the trial court's vehicle confiscation order, finding procedural violations under the NDPS Act. The lower court had ordered confiscation of petitioner Hem Raj Sharma's Alto car (used by his driver in drug trafficking) without providing prior notice to the vehicle owner or hearing him on the confiscation issue, despite Section 63(2) of the NDPS Act mandating such notice. Since Sharma testified as a prosecution witness that his driver misused the vehicle without his knowledge, the court held confiscation improper absent evidence of his connivance or knowledge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts