NHAI(Not Applicable) vs YOGESH GUPTA AND ORS(Not Applicable) — OMPM/391/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: Contested--DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED. on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010542312025

Filing Number

OMPM/45929/2025

Filing Date

01-Sep-2025

Registration No

OMPM/391/2025

Registration Date

23-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DELAY CONDONATED/REJECTED.

Last updated 13-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NHAI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sumeet Raj Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YOGESH GUPTA AND ORS(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

    Summary: The court condoned a 225-day delay in filing NHAI's appeal against the District Judge's judgment dated 02.01.2025, which had upheld an arbitral award against NHAI. The delay was attributed to unavoidable circumstances involving the engaged law firm, and the respondent raised no objection. Additionally, the court stayed execution of the impugned judgment and arbitral award pending appeal, conditioned on NHAI depositing the entire awarded amount with interest in court within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Jan-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 03-Dec-2025

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  5. 07-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  6. 07-Oct-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  7. 01-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. OMPM/391/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court condoned a 225-day delay in filing NHAI's appeal against the District Judge's judgment dated 02.01.2025, which had upheld an arbitral award against NHAI. The delay was attributed to unavoidable circumstances involving the engaged law firm, and the respondent raised no objection. Additionally, the court stayed execution of the impugned judgment and arbitral award pending appeal, conditioned on NHAI depositing the entire awarded amount with interest in court within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case