MOHAN SINGH(Not Applicable) vs Bharat Singh AND ANR(Not Applicable) — Cr.A.(A-SB)/9/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 413. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010535972025
Filing Number
Cr.A.(A-SB)/8195/2025
Filing Date
29-Aug-2025
Registration No
Cr.A.(A-SB)/9/2025
Registration Date
13-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAN SINGH(Not Applicable)
Adv. Jagat Pal,Parul,Parul, ,Harish Kumar,Parul
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bharat Singh AND ANR(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Desh Raj Thakur 1123
-
2.Ranvir Singh(Not Applicable)
Adv. Desh Raj Thakur
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Mohan Singh's criminal appeal against the acquittal of Bharat Singh and another, upholding the trial court's decision. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges of wrongful restraint (IPC §341) and criminal intimidation (IPC §506), noting the prosecution failed to establish that the complainant belonged to a Scheduled Caste category as required for SCST Act violations, and the allegations lacked corroboration regarding specific intent to cause alarm or restraint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
24-Dec-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
03-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
15-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
15-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A.(A-SB)/9/2025
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Mohan Singh's criminal appeal against the acquittal of Bharat Singh and another, upholding the trial court's decision. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the charges of wrongful restraint (IPC §341) and criminal intimidation (IPC §506), noting the prosecution failed to establish that the complainant belonged to a Scheduled Caste category as required for SCST Act violations, and the allegations lacked corroboration regarding specific intent to cause alarm or restraint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts