ARUN BANSAL(Not Applicable) vs ROHINI and others(Not Applicable) Advocate - Pranjal Munjal — CMP.M/1567/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39 R 2 A. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010514562025
Filing Number
CMP.M/43490/2025
Filing Date
22-Aug-2025
Registration No
CMP.M/1567/2025
Registration Date
30-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARUN BANSAL(Not Applicable)
Adv. Shashi Kiran
Respondent(s)
-
1.ROHINI and others(Not Applicable) Advocate - Pranjal Munjal
-
2.Sheetal(Not Applicable)
-
3.Kanchan(Not Applicable)
-
4.Jas Pal(Not Applicable)
Adv. Gaurav Kumar
-
5.Lalita Kumari(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
Case Summary: In CMP(M) No.1567 of 2025, the court adjourned the matter for two weeks pending service of notice on respondent No.5. Respondent No.4's advocate was present and directed to file a reply in the interim. Respondents 1-3 did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi
-
07-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
24-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
08-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
08-Oct-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
03-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CMP.M/1567/2025
Case Summary: In CMP(M) No.1567 of 2025, the court adjourned the matter for two weeks pending service of notice on respondent No.5. Respondent No.4's advocate was present and directed to file a reply in the interim. Respondents 1-3 did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts