THAKRI DEVI AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs TEHLU RAM(Not Applicable) Advocate - Nitin Soni, ,B L Soni,NEMO — RSA/186/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010506512025
Filing Number
RSA/42811/2025
Filing Date
19-Aug-2025
Registration No
RSA/186/2025
Registration Date
21-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THAKRI DEVI AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. Bhagwati Chander Verma,Sumit Sharma,Sumit Sharma, ,Digvijay Singh Bisht,Sumit Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.TEHLU RAM(Not Applicable) Advocate - Nitin Soni, ,B L Soni,NEMO
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
Case Summary: RSA No. 186/2025 The Regular Second Appeal filed by Thakri Devi and another against Tehlu Ram regarding a property sale dispute was admitted on 06.05.2026. The court identified two substantial questions of law: (1) whether the registered Sale Deed carries presumption of correctness and binds the parties given the plaintiff's admission of possession delivery and partial payment receipt of Rs. 1,72,000; and (2) whether the District Judge erred in dismissing the plaintiff's application for additional evidence before considering it with the appeal. The matter is listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
09-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
17-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
29-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
22-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
22-Aug-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi
-
19-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. RSA/186/2025
Case Summary: RSA No. 186/2025 The Regular Second Appeal filed by Thakri Devi and another against Tehlu Ram regarding a property sale dispute was admitted on 06.05.2026. The court identified two substantial questions of law: (1) whether the registered Sale Deed carries presumption of correctness and binds the parties given the plaintiff's admission of possession delivery and partial payment receipt of Rs. 1,72,000; and (2) whether the District Judge erred in dismissing the plaintiff's application for additional evidence before considering it with the appeal. The matter is listed for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts