Jeet Kaur (DECEASED THROUGH LRs JOGESH AHLUWALIA AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs Rajesh Kumar Walia(Not Applicable) Advocate - Janesh Gupta, ,NEMO — CR/39/2025
Case under Urban Rent Cotrol Act, 1987 Section 24(5). Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 07th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010494672024
Filing Number
CR/40460/2024
Filing Date
30-09-2024
Registration No
CR/39/2025
Registration Date
17-05-2025
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROMESH VERMA
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROMESH VERMA
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jeet Kaur (DECEASED THROUGH LRs JOGESH AHLUWALIA AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sanjeev Sood,Het Ram,Het Ram, ,Janesh Gupta,Het Ram
Respondent(s)
Rajesh Kumar Walia(Not Applicable) Advocate - Janesh Gupta, ,NEMO
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROMESH VERMA
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-06-2025 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 27-02-2026 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 04-12-2025 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 17-11-2025 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
| 11-09-2025 | ADMISSION AFTER NOTICE |
Orders
Case Summary: CR 39/2025 - High Court of Himachal Pradesh The High Court dismissed the landlady's petition challenging the Appellate Authority's June 2024 judgment. The Rent Controller had ordered eviction for non-payment of rent (Rs. 22,68,890), but the Appellate Court modified this after the landlady's counsel conceded that excess deposited amounts should be adjusted against future rent with 6% interest. Justice Romesh Verma found no error in the Appellate Court's order, as it merely gave effect to the landlady's own concession regarding calculation of arrears. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CR 39/2025 - High Court of Himachal Pradesh The High Court dismissed the landlady's petition challenging the Appellate Authority's June 2024 judgment. The Rent Controller had ordered eviction for non-payment of rent (Rs. 22,68,890), but the Appellate Court modified this after the landlady's counsel conceded that excess deposited amounts should be adjusted against future rent with 6% interest. Justice Romesh Verma found no error in the Appellate Court's order, as it merely gave effect to the landlady's own concession regarding calculation of arrears. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts