USHA SHARMA ALIAS KUSHALA AND ORS(Not Applicable) vs KRISHAN LAL NEGI THROUGH LRs AND ORS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Virender Thakur — CMP.M/2433/2025

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010493142025

Filing Number

CMP.M/41690/2025

Filing Date

13-Aug-2025

Registration No

CMP.M/2433/2025

Registration Date

31-Dec-2025

Judge

Additional Registrar(j)

Coram

Additional Registrar(j)

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.USHA SHARMA ALIAS KUSHALA AND ORS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Madhurika Sekhon

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KRISHAN LAL NEGI THROUGH LRs AND ORS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Virender Thakur

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

    In CMP(M) No. 2433/2025, the court adjourned the matter for two weeks to allow respondents 1(a), 1(b), and 2 to file a Power of Attorney through their counsel Virender Thakur. Respondents 3 and 4 were proceeded against ex-parte due to non-appearance despite valid service. The case is listed for further hearing before the court for appropriate orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  7. 05-Jan-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  8. 13-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP.M/2433/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In CMP(M) No. 2433/2025, the court adjourned the matter for two weeks to allow respondents 1(a), 1(b), and 2 to file a Power of Attorney through their counsel Virender Thakur. Respondents 3 and 4 were proceeded against ex-parte due to non-appearance despite valid service. The case is listed for further hearing before the court for appropriate orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case