JOGINDER SINGH(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/9639/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010482712023

Filing Number

CWP/38020/2023

Filing Date

30-Nov-2023

Registration No

CWP/9639/2023

Registration Date

30-Nov-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JOGINDER SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Loveneesh singh Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.The Director of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries,(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Deputy Director,(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Sh. Amrit Pal(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Summary of CWP No. 9639/2023 Joginder Singh challenged his transfer order dated 31.10.2023, arguing it was premature as he had not completed his normal tenure at V.D Bangaloo, Mandi. The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition after noting that the petitioner had since completed his tenure. The court closed proceedings with an observation that the State may transfer him in accordance with law if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Dec-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  4. 01-Dec-2023

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  5. 30-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9639/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP No. 9639/2023 Joginder Singh challenged his transfer order dated 31.10.2023, arguing it was premature as he had not completed his normal tenure at V.D Bangaloo, Mandi. The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the petition after noting that the petitioner had since completed his tenure. The court closed proceedings with an observation that the State may transfer him in accordance with law if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case