GOPAL MAHAJAN(Not Applicable) vs AJAY SALWANI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Ajay K Sharma, ,Abhishek Sharma,Rahul Lakhanpal,Ajay K Sharma,NEMO — CR.R/448/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 442. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010466612025
Filing Number
CR.R/7112/2025
Filing Date
30-Jul-2025
Registration No
CR.R/448/2025
Registration Date
05-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOPAL MAHAJAN(Not Applicable)
Adv. Surinder Kumar Saklani
Respondent(s)
-
1.AJAY SALWANI(Not Applicable) Advocate - Ajay K Sharma, ,Abhishek Sharma,Rahul Lakhanpal,Ajay K Sharma,NEMO
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
In Cr.MMO No.448 of 2025, the case of Gopal Mahajan vs. Ajay Salwani was heard on 06.05.2026 with both counsel present. The court adjourned the matter and listed it for further hearing on 24.06.2026 as requested by the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
30-Dec-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
18-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
17-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
06-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
07-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CR.R/448/2025
In Cr.MMO No.448 of 2025, the case of Gopal Mahajan vs. Ajay Salwani was heard on 06.05.2026 with both counsel present. The court adjourned the matter and listed it for further hearing on 24.06.2026 as requested by the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on merits was passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts