ANNU BALA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sukrit Sood, AG,Het Ram — CWP/4370/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010465732019

Filing Number

CWP/39344/2019

Filing Date

24-Dec-2019

Registration No

CWP/4370/2019

Registration Date

24-Dec-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANNU BALA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vinay Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) Advocate - Sukrit Sood, AG,Het Ram

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    CWP No. 4370/2019 Summary: The case was adjourned on 06.05.2026. The court directed completion of service of respondent No.4 within one week, with notice returnable for 23.06.2026. In the interim, the served parties were ordered to exchange reply/rejoinder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Apr-2020

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara

  4. 13-Mar-2020

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop ChitkaraView PDF

  5. 13-Mar-2020

    Notice Before Admission

    Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara

  6. 30-Dec-2019

    Honourable Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary,hon'ble Mr. Justice Anoop ChitkaraView PDF

  7. 30-Dec-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Dec-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/4370/2019

casestatus.in Summary

CWP No. 4370/2019 Summary: The case was adjourned on 06.05.2026. The court directed completion of service of respondent No.4 within one week, with notice returnable for 23.06.2026. In the interim, the served parties were ordered to exchange reply/rejoinder. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case