RUBY ATTRI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/12345/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010459252025
Filing Number
CWP/38907/2025
Filing Date
28-Jul-2025
Registration No
CWP/12345/2025
Registration Date
29-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 28-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUBY ATTRI(Not Applicable)
Adv. Arsh Chauhan
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Vikrant Thakur,AG 1123
-
2.Himachal Pradesh, Public Service Commission(Not Applicable)
-
3.Rajesh Kumar(Not Applicable)
-
4.Harinder Singh(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
07-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
Case Outcome Summary: The case is adjourned to 13.05.2026. The court noted that the petitioner Ruby Attri obtained the same marks as two selected candidates in Paper-II and would have qualified based on higher Paper-I marks, but directs the Additional Advocate General to provide instructions on whether a Junior Auditor Class-III post is available in the general category before passing any final order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
28-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
28-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
-
28-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/12345/2025
Case Outcome Summary: The case is adjourned to 13.05.2026. The court noted that the petitioner Ruby Attri obtained the same marks as two selected candidates in Paper-II and would have qualified based on higher Paper-I marks, but directs the Additional Advocate General to provide instructions on whether a Junior Auditor Class-III post is available in the general category before passing any final order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts