PIYUSH SHARMA AND ORS(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CRMMO/753/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010457962025
Filing Number
CRMMO/6969/2025
Filing Date
28-Jul-2025
Registration No
CRMMO/753/2025
Registration Date
07-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PIYUSH SHARMA AND ORS(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ashwani Kumar Sharma,Nitin Rishi,Nitin Rishi, ,Shivani,Nitin Rishi
-
2.Ram Chand(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ashwani Kumar Sharma
-
3.Purnima Sharma(Not Applicable)
Adv. Ashwani Kumar Sharma
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HP AND ORS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.SHO(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG
-
3.Ashish Patiyal(Not Applicable)
Adv. Shiv Pal Manhans
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
In CRMMO-753 of 2025 (Piyush Sharma v. State of HP), the court adjourned the matter and granted the petitioner's counsel two weeks' time to file a rejoinder, with replies from respondents No.1 & 2 already on record and respondent No.3 permitted to file its reply in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
07-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
19-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
24-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CRMMO/753/2025
In CRMMO-753 of 2025 (Piyush Sharma v. State of HP), the court adjourned the matter and granted the petitioner's counsel two weeks' time to file a rejoinder, with replies from respondents No.1 & 2 already on record and respondent No.3 permitted to file its reply in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts