DEVENDER SINGH(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/8907/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010452222023

Filing Number

CWP/35531/2023

Filing Date

08-Nov-2023

Registration No

CWP/8907/2023

Registration Date

09-Nov-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVENDER SINGH(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Vinod Chauhan,Aanchal Singh,Aanchal Singh, ,Akhil Thakur,Aanchal Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,ag 1123

  2. 2.The Commandant General (Home Guards)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Commandant,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Devender Singh's petition challenging the rejection of his re-engagement in Home Guards on the ground that he had exceeded the age limit of 50 years. The court found no illegality in the rejection order, relying on a coordinate bench judgment establishing that Home Guard volunteers can only be enrolled if they are above 18 years and have not crossed 50 years of age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Oct-2024

    Additional Registrar(j)View PDF

  4. 02-Apr-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  5. 10-Nov-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

  6. 10-Nov-2023

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  7. 08-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8907/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Devender Singh's petition challenging the rejection of his re-engagement in Home Guards on the ground that he had exceeded the age limit of 50 years. The court found no illegality in the rejection order, relying on a coordinate bench judgment establishing that Home Guard volunteers can only be enrolled if they are above 18 years and have not crossed 50 years of age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case