ANIL KUMAR(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CRMP/3289/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010424262025

Filing Number

CRMP/6484/2025

Filing Date

15-Jul-2025

Registration No

CRMP/3289/2025

Registration Date

30-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 430

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL KUMAR(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ganesh Barowalia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: Anil Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Anil Kumar's application for suspension of his 15-year rigorous imprisonment sentence for drug offenses under the ND&PS Act. Although the two independent witnesses (PW-10 and PW-11) turned hostile and initially denied witnessing the contraband recovery, their cross-examination admissions corroborated the prosecution's case, including identification of seized materials and their signatures on seizure memos, providing no grounds for sentence suspension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Pronouncement Of Order

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  4. 15-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRMP/3289/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Anil Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh Decision: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed Anil Kumar's application for suspension of his 15-year rigorous imprisonment sentence for drug offenses under the ND&PS Act. Although the two independent witnesses (PW-10 and PW-11) turned hostile and initially denied witnessing the contraband recovery, their cross-examination admissions corroborated the prosecution's case, including identification of seized materials and their signatures on seizure memos, providing no grounds for sentence suspension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case