ROHINI AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) vs Ravi Shankar(Not Applicable) — CMPMO/389/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010403202025
Filing Number
CMPMO/34125/2025
Filing Date
08-Jul-2025
Registration No
CMPMO/389/2025
Registration Date
11-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ROHINI AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)
Adv. Yug Singhal,Hitender Verma,Hitender Verma, ,Ananya Kiran Sharma,Hitender Verma
-
2.paridhi(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ravi Shankar(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Parveen Kumar Chandel,Shalini Thakur,NEMO 1123
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed CMPMO 389/2025 filed by Rohini and another against Ravi Shankar as infructuous, accepting the petitioners' own contention that the petition had become infructuous by efflux of time. All pending applications were also dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF
-
20-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
16-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
12-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
14-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
14-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CMPMO/389/2025
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed CMPMO 389/2025 filed by Rohini and another against Ravi Shankar as infructuous, accepting the petitioners' own contention that the petition had become infructuous by efflux of time. All pending applications were also dismissed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts