ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY(Not Applicable) vs MADHU(Not Applicable) — FAO/36/2015

Case under Employees Compensation Act Section SECTION30. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 26th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Jul-2015

CNR: HPHC010400682014

Filing Number

FAO/20476/2014

Filing Date

06-Dec-2014

Registration No

FAO/36/2015

Registration Date

30-Jan-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDER ( 17 )

Sub-Category

APPEAL UNDER THE EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ACT ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

26-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Employees Compensation Act Section SECTION30

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Deepak Gupta

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MADHU(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Ajay Kochhar,Rajesh Kashyap,NEMO,R-4,Rajesh Kashyap 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    Summary of FAO/36/2015 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh set aside the Employee's Compensation Commissioner's award of Rs. 3,32,055/- with 12% interest to Madhu and others against Oriental Insurance Company, finding the lower court's reasoning insufficiently explained on critical issues. The court remanded the case for fresh decision, citing the Commissioner's contradictory findings regarding the driver's valid driving license and the employer-employee relationship, without providing adequate reasoning for awarding compensation to the insurance company despite these deficiencies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  4. 20-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  5. 20-May-2026

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  6. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  7. 29-Feb-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  8. 05-Dec-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  9. 05-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

  10. 02-Nov-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

  11. 02-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  12. 18-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya

  13. 21-Sep-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

  14. 23-Aug-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF

  15. 23-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  16. 05-Jul-2023

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  17. 11-Apr-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  18. 11-Jan-2023

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  19. 12-Jan-2018

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar ThakurView PDF

  20. 13-Jul-2015

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  21. 24-Feb-2015

    Honourable Mr. Justice Rajiv SharmaView PDF

  22. 06-Dec-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/36/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of FAO/36/2015 The High Court of Himachal Pradesh set aside the Employee's Compensation Commissioner's award of Rs. 3,32,055/- with 12% interest to Madhu and others against Oriental Insurance Company, finding the lower court's reasoning insufficiently explained on critical issues. The court remanded the case for fresh decision, citing the Commissioner's contradictory findings regarding the driver's valid driving license and the employer-employee relationship, without providing adequate reasoning for awarding compensation to the insurance company despite these deficiencies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case