MEEN SINGH(Not Applicable) vs ASHA RAM(Not Applicable) Advocate - Parkash Sharma — CR.R/568/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 442. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HPHC010398802024
Filing Number
CR.R/9214/2024
Filing Date
27-Aug-2024
Registration No
CR.R/568/2024
Registration Date
03-Sep-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MEEN SINGH(Not Applicable)
Adv. Vinod Chauhan,Aanchal Singh,Aanchal Singh, ,Vivek Thakur,Aanchal Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHA RAM(Not Applicable) Advocate - Parkash Sharma
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: CR.R/568/2024 (Meen Singh v. Asha Ram) In this revision petition, the Court granted the petitioner four weeks' additional time to deposit the remaining ₹3,00,000 (out of total ₹8,80,000), noting substantial compliance with a prior order dated 18.03.2026. The petitioner had already deposited ₹5,80,000 across court registries. The case was adjourned to 03.06.2026, with a warning that failure to deposit the remaining amount would result in the petition being decided on merits. A related interlocutory application was disposed as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF
-
19-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
19-Dec-2024
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja
-
05-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF
-
25-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
04-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh KainthlaView PDF
-
04-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CR.R/568/2024
Case Summary: CR.R/568/2024 (Meen Singh v. Asha Ram) In this revision petition, the Court granted the petitioner four weeks' additional time to deposit the remaining ₹3,00,000 (out of total ₹8,80,000), noting substantial compliance with a prior order dated 18.03.2026. The petitioner had already deposited ₹5,80,000 across court registries. The case was adjourned to 03.06.2026, with a warning that failure to deposit the remaining amount would result in the petition being decided on merits. A related interlocutory application was disposed as infructuous. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts