RAJNI DEVI(Not Applicable) vs ROHIT(Not Applicable) — CMPMO/305/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010386682026

Filing Number

CMPMO/33594/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

CMPMO/305/2026

Registration Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJNI DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Meera Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ROHIT(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh VermaView PDF

    Case Summary: CMPMO/305/2026 Rajni Devi's petition challenged the Family Court's order closing her evidence in a divorce case filed by her husband Rohit on grounds of desertion and cruelty. The High Court found the Family Court's order legally sound, as Rajni had repeatedly failed to present evidence across multiple hearings from August 2025 to June 2026. However, the court granted one final opportunity to record her evidence as a matter of indulgence, citing her father's medical emergency in court on the scheduled hearing date, subject to payment of Rs.10,000 costs to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMPMO/305/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMPMO/305/2026 Rajni Devi's petition challenged the Family Court's order closing her evidence in a divorce case filed by her husband Rohit on grounds of desertion and cruelty. The High Court found the Family Court's order legally sound, as Rajni had repeatedly failed to present evidence across multiple hearings from August 2025 to June 2026. However, the court granted one final opportunity to record her evidence as a matter of indulgence, citing her father's medical emergency in court on the scheduled hearing date, subject to payment of Rs.10,000 costs to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case