BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD(Not Applicable) AMAN SOOD vs GULAB DEVI(Not Applicable) — CMP.M/949/2026

Case under Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010384492026

Filing Number

CMP.M/33401/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

CMP.M/949/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act, 1963 Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD(Not Applicable) AMAN SOOD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GULAB DEVI(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sushil KukrejaView PDF

    Case Summary: The court allowed applications CMPs (M) No. 948 & 949/2026 to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondent Daleep Singh Gopen (died 08.09.2020) on record in the insurance matter. The court condoned the delay in filing the applications, finding it was beyond the applicant's control—the applicant, described as a rustic village lady, lacked awareness of legal procedures and had not initially disclosed the death. The court permitted the legal heirs to continue the proceedings, as their right to sue survives in the deceased's place. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP.M/949/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court allowed applications CMPs (M) No. 948 & 949/2026 to bring the legal representatives of deceased respondent Daleep Singh Gopen (died 08.09.2020) on record in the insurance matter. The court condoned the delay in filing the applications, finding it was beyond the applicant's control—the applicant, described as a rustic village lady, lacked awareness of legal procedures and had not initially disclosed the death. The court permitted the legal heirs to continue the proceedings, as their right to sue survives in the deceased's place. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case