MADAN LAL SHARMA(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP(Not Applicable) — CWP/9853/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jun-2026

CNR: HPHC010383552026

Filing Number

CWP/33339/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

CWP/9853/2026

Registration Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADAN LAL SHARMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sanjay Kumar Sharma,Sanjay Gandhi,Sanjay Gandhi, ,Kamini,Sanjay Gandhi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.State of HP(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Directorate of Industries(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.District Collector(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Sub Divisional Magistrate(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Dev Bhoomi Wheels LLP(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. 22-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP No.9853/2026 The petition filed by Madan Lal Sharma against the State of H.P. and others was heard on 19.06.2026. The court adjourned the matter to 22.06.2026 for consolidation with a related petition (CWP No.9566/2026) filed by Respondent No.6 on the same subject matter. The Deputy Advocate General was directed to obtain instructions addressing all issues raised in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9853/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP No.9853/2026 The petition filed by Madan Lal Sharma against the State of H.P. and others was heard on 19.06.2026. The court adjourned the matter to 22.06.2026 for consolidation with a related petition (CWP No.9566/2026) filed by Respondent No.6 on the same subject matter. The Deputy Advocate General was directed to obtain instructions addressing all issues raised in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case