SANT RAM CHAUHAN AND ANR(Not Applicable) vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS(Not Applicable) — CWP/7809/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HPHC010381732022
Filing Number
CWP/29944/2022
Filing Date
07-Nov-2022
Registration No
CWP/7809/2022
Registration Date
09-Nov-2022
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANT RAM CHAUHAN AND ANR(Not Applicable)
Adv. Adarsh Kumar Vashista,Shivom Vashista,Shivom Vashista, ,Shivom Vashista
-
2.Prashant Kumar(Not Applicable)
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS(Not Applicable)
Adv. ,Sambhav Bhasin,Deven Krishan Khanna,ASGI 1123
-
2.The Secretary(Not Applicable)
-
3.The Director,(Not Applicable)
-
4.National Institute of Technology(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
Summary: CWP/7809/2022 - Sant Ram Chauhan & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors Court's Decision: The Himachal Pradesh High Court allowed the petitions and quashed the NIT's July 2022 rejection of teachers' Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) benefits. The court held that NIT cannot deny AGP ₹9000 promotion eligibility based on a pre-April 30, 2013 cutoff date, as the Supreme Court's prior directions required considering claims under 2012-2013 guidelines without such temporal restrictions. Key Reasoning: Since the respondents never disputed the teachers' substantive eligibility before the Supreme Court (only procedural method), and the promised 4-tier faculty structure was never implemented, denying benefits using the cutoff date contradicts Supreme Court orders and constitutes arbitrary action in violation of administrative law principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
16-Apr-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
30-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
09-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
05-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
08-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
18-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
18-Nov-2025
Hearing
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
04-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
05-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
12-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
12-Dec-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
19-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
19-Nov-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
19-Nov-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
-
05-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
05-Nov-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander Negi
-
14-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Bipin Chander NegiView PDF
-
09-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
09-Aug-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
08-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
08-Aug-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
07-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
07-Aug-2024
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
06-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
01-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
12-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
22-May-2024
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
20-May-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
21-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
21-Sep-2023
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya
-
05-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
22-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Satyen VaidyaView PDF
-
21-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
23-Jun-2023
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF
-
23-May-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
19-May-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
28-Mar-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
28-Mar-2023
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel
-
27-Mar-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
11-Jan-2023
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF
-
23-Dec-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
23-Dec-2022
Admission After Notice
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
09-Dec-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
08-Dec-2022
Notice Before Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh
-
10-Nov-2022
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan,hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF
-
10-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/7809/2022
Summary: CWP/7809/2022 - Sant Ram Chauhan & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors Court's Decision: The Himachal Pradesh High Court allowed the petitions and quashed the NIT's July 2022 rejection of teachers' Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) benefits. The court held that NIT cannot deny AGP ₹9000 promotion eligibility based on a pre-April 30, 2013 cutoff date, as the Supreme Court's prior directions required considering claims under 2012-2013 guidelines without such temporal restrictions. Key Reasoning: Since the respondents never disputed the teachers' substantive eligibility before the Supreme Court (only procedural method), and the promised 4-tier faculty structure was never implemented, denying benefits using the cutoff date contradicts Supreme Court orders and constitutes arbitrary action in violation of administrative law principles. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts