REVATI DEVI(Not Applicable) vs ACCOUNTANT GENERAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CWP/8397/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010380372024

Filing Number

CWP/30649/2024

Filing Date

17-Aug-2024

Registration No

CWP/8397/2024

Registration Date

17-Aug-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.REVATI DEVI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Nitin Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ACCOUNTANT GENERAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Rangil Singh,AG 1123

  2. 2.Block Development officer,(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

    Case Summary: In CWP No. 8397/2024, Revati Devi's petition against the Accountant General and Block Development Officer was adjourned. The Additional Advocate General for the State submitted that his file was not traceable. The court granted his request and postponed the hearing by three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  4. 24-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep SharmaView PDF

  5. 28-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  6. 28-Aug-2024

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel

  7. 20-Aug-2024

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan GoelView PDF

  8. 20-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/8397/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In CWP No. 8397/2024, Revati Devi's petition against the Accountant General and Block Development Officer was adjourned. The Additional Advocate General for the State submitted that his file was not traceable. The court granted his request and postponed the hearing by three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case