MADAN LAL(Not Applicable) vs SURESH KUMAR (deceased) through LRs ADN ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — CMPMO/303/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 227. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010379312026

Filing Number

CMPMO/32962/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

CMPMO/303/2026

Registration Date

18-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADAN LAL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. G R Palsra,Lokesh Thakur,Lokesh Thakur, ,Manjeet Singh Pasreecha,Jia Lal,Lokesh Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SURESH KUMAR (deceased) through LRs ADN ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

  2. 2.Sh. Ram Lal(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh set aside the District Judge's order dated 25.05.2026 that separately decided an application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC (for admitting additional evidence/Patta documents). The court held that such applications must be decided together with the main appeal on merits, not separately, following Supreme Court precedent. The District Judge was directed to reconsider the application and main appeal jointly at final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMPMO/303/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh set aside the District Judge's order dated 25.05.2026 that separately decided an application under Order 41 Rule 27 CPC (for admitting additional evidence/Patta documents). The court held that such applications must be decided together with the main appeal on merits, not separately, following Supreme Court precedent. The District Judge was directed to reconsider the application and main appeal jointly at final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case