RAMA(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — EX.P./876/2025

Case under High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section C16. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th September 2025.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010376792025

Filing Number

EX.P./31893/2025

Filing Date

27-Jun-2025

Registration No

EX.P./876/2025

Registration Date

07-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-Sep-2025

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

High Court of Himachal Pradesh (Original Side) Rules, 1997 Section C16

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAMA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Aanchal Singh,Vinod Chauhan,Vinod Chauhan, ,Nandita,Vivek Thakur,Vinod Chauhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.State of H.P Secretary (Finance) to the Government of Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Director Health Services Himachal Pradesh(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Chief Medical Officer(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Block Medical Officer(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Senior Medical Officer(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    In Rama v. State of H.P., the court dismissed the applicant's CMP application as withdrawn at the petitioner's request. The court granted liberty to the applicant to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law at a later stage, allowing the matter to be reopened if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  4. 21-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  5. 21-Jul-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  6. 27-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EX.P./876/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Rama v. State of H.P., the court dismissed the applicant's CMP application as withdrawn at the petitioner's request. The court granted liberty to the applicant to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law at a later stage, allowing the matter to be reopened if needed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case