BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) vs NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable) — COPC/760/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010371732026

Filing Number

COPC/32311/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

COPC/760/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BALBIR SINGH AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Ashok Kumar

  2. 2.Jagdish Chand(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Beni Madhav(Not Applicable)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIPUN JINDAL AND ANOTHER(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Virender Singh Kanwar 1123

  2. 2.Maneet Verma(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed contempt proceedings against respondents Nipun Jindal and another after they produced internal office letters dated 18-19 June 2026 demonstrating compliance with a prior judgment. The petitioners' counsel acknowledged the respondents' compliance, leading the court to discharge all notices and close the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  5. 17-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. COPC/760/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Himachal Pradesh closed contempt proceedings against respondents Nipun Jindal and another after they produced internal office letters dated 18-19 June 2026 demonstrating compliance with a prior judgment. The petitioners' counsel acknowledged the respondents' compliance, leading the court to discharge all notices and close the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case