YASH PAUL(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/9080/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010360902026

Filing Number

CWP/31402/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

CWP/9080/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YASH PAUL(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Karan Singh Kanwar,Shivani Kanwar,Shivani Kanwar, ,Shivani Kanwar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG,Dhiraj Thakur 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Yash Paul after the petitioner sought withdrawal. The petitioner's counsel stated that respondents had begun processing the petitioner's permission request to operate DJ/loud speaker and sound systems at a camping site, making the petition's continuation unnecessary. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to refile if needed and disposed of all pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9080/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of the writ petition filed by Yash Paul after the petitioner sought withdrawal. The petitioner's counsel stated that respondents had begun processing the petitioner's permission request to operate DJ/loud speaker and sound systems at a camping site, making the petition's continuation unnecessary. The court allowed withdrawal with liberty to refile if needed and disposed of all pending miscellaneous applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case