THE PRINCIPAL CONVENT OF JESUS AND MARRY CHELSEA(Not Applicable) vs HIMANI CHATRANTA(Not Applicable) Advocate - Kamakshi Tarlokta — CWP/9003/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.

Next hearing 30-Jun-2026

CNR: HPHC010357232026

Filing Number

CWP/31063/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

CWP/9003/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE PRINCIPAL CONVENT OF JESUS AND MARRY CHELSEA(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Abhinav Mohan Goel

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIMANI CHATRANTA(Not Applicable) Advocate - Kamakshi Tarlokta

Case History

  1. 30-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-Jun-2026

    Notice Before Admission

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP 9003/2026 Principal Convent of Jesus and Mary v. Himani Chatranta (05.06.2026) The caveat petition was allowed and disposed of. The main petition was adjourned to 30.06.2026. The respondent's counsel waived notice and was directed to file a reply within three weeks. Both parties were ordered to submit complete records from lower authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9003/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP 9003/2026 Principal Convent of Jesus and Mary v. Himani Chatranta (05.06.2026) The caveat petition was allowed and disposed of. The main petition was adjourned to 30.06.2026. The respondent's counsel waived notice and was directed to file a reply within three weeks. Both parties were ordered to submit complete records from lower authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case