RAJNI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/9086/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

CNR: HPHC010357212026

Filing Number

CWP/31061/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

CWP/9086/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJNI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Sunil Chauhan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

  2. 2.Director, Department of Women and Child Development(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.Himachal Pradesh,Bal Kalyan Parishad, Kaig Garden(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.Child Development Project Offhcer(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jul-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: In CWP No. 9086/2026, the petition filed by Rajni against the State of Himachal Pradesh and others was adjourned. The respondents' Deputy Advocate General waived service of notice and was granted four weeks to file a reply. The case is scheduled for consideration on 08.07.2026. Additionally, CMP No. 13293/2026 was disposed of as not pressed by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9086/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In CWP No. 9086/2026, the petition filed by Rajni against the State of Himachal Pradesh and others was adjourned. The respondents' Deputy Advocate General waived service of notice and was granted four weeks to file a reply. The case is scheduled for consideration on 08.07.2026. Additionally, CMP No. 13293/2026 was disposed of as not pressed by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case