AISHA BEGUM(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/9087/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
CNR: HPHC010357202026
Filing Number
CWP/31060/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
CWP/9087/2026
Registration Date
04-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AISHA BEGUM(Not Applicable)
Adv. Sunil Chauhan
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)
Adv. AG 1123
-
2.Director, Department of Women and Child Development M.C. Parking(Not Applicable)
-
3.Himachal Pradesh, Kalyan Parishad, Kaig Garden(Not Applicable)
-
4.Child Development Project Officer(Not Applicable)
Case History
-
08-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jul-2026
Office Objection
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua , Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma
-
05-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua,hon'ble Mr. Justice Ranjan SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: In CWP No. 9087 of 2026, the court adjourned the petition filed by Smt. Aisha Begum against the State of Himachal Pradesh. The Deputy Advocate General waived notice and was granted four weeks to file the State's reply. The case is listed for consideration on 08.07.2026. An ancillary application (CMP No. 13294 of 2026) was disposed of as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/9087/2026
Case Summary: In CWP No. 9087 of 2026, the court adjourned the petition filed by Smt. Aisha Begum against the State of Himachal Pradesh. The Deputy Advocate General waived notice and was granted four weeks to file the State's reply. The case is listed for consideration on 08.07.2026. An ancillary application (CMP No. 13294 of 2026) was disposed of as not pressed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts