CHET RAM(Not Applicable) vs STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/5744/2020

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HPHC010356932020

Filing Number

CWP/31306/2020

Filing Date

28-Oct-2020

Registration No

CWP/5744/2020

Registration Date

14-Dec-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 14-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHET RAM(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Manohar Lal Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. AG 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

    The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petition with liberty reserved, as the respondents rejected the petitioner's claim for an increment dated 01.12.1985 (with consequential benefits and interest) through an office order dated 08.04.2026 during the petition's pendency. The petitioner retains the right to challenge the rejection order separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

  5. 10-Apr-2026

    Admission After Notice

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal BhardwajView PDF

  7. 09-Mar-2021

    Honourable Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath,hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

  8. 09-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 28-Oct-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/5744/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The Himachal Pradesh High Court disposed of the writ petition with liberty reserved, as the respondents rejected the petitioner's claim for an increment dated 01.12.1985 (with consequential benefits and interest) through an office order dated 08.04.2026 during the petition's pendency. The petitioner retains the right to challenge the rejection order separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case