SALOCHNA NEGI(Not Applicable) vs THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable) — CWP/9093/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HPHC010353332026

Filing Number

CWP/30732/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

CWP/9093/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SALOCHNA NEGI(Not Applicable)

    Adv. Atharv Sharma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS(Not Applicable)

    Adv. ,Dhananjay Sharma,AG 1123

  2. 2.The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (HoFF)(Not Applicable)

  3. 3.The Divisional Forest Officer(Not Applicable)

  4. 4.H.P. State Electricity Board Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan(Not Applicable)

  5. 5.Chief Engineer (Op) (South), HP. State Electricity Board Ltd(Not Applicable)

  6. 6.Deputy Chief Engineer, Op Circle, H.P. State Electricity Board Ltd.(Not Applicable)

  7. 7.Senior Executive Engineer, Electrical Division No.2(Not Applicable)

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal DuaView PDF

    Case Summary: Salochna Negi v. State of HP & Others (CWP 9093/2026) The petition was adjourned for further hearing. The court directed respondents to file their reply within three weeks and ordered that if no legal obstacles exist, the electrical pole (which petitioner claims poses safety risks) must be shifted by the next hearing date. A related application (CMP 13304/2026) was disposed with a direction for the petitioner to file translated copies of relevant documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Office Objection

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/9093/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Salochna Negi v. State of HP & Others (CWP 9093/2026) The petition was adjourned for further hearing. The court directed respondents to file their reply within three weeks and ordered that if no legal obstacles exist, the electrical pole (which petitioner claims poses safety risks) must be shifted by the next hearing date. A related application (CMP 13304/2026) was disposed with a direction for the petitioner to file translated copies of relevant documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case